ATI HD2900XT Crossfire vs Nvidia 8800 GTX SLI |
|---|
| First, I didn't perform these bench marks. But I managed to find them. The crossfire tests were done on Vista Ultimate 64 (slow system and resource hog)The SLI tests were done on Windows XP SP1 (huge advantage)And why do they put the top card against the runner up? Well here's top dog against top dog. |
| 8800 GTX test step-up |
 |
| ATI test set-up |
 |
| First Lets Start out with what we always
see. 3D06 over all score single HD 2900XT vs
single 8800 GTX. Yep the 8800 GTX is faster. |
 |
| Ok on to Crosswired vs SLI 3D06 over all score 8800 GTX's SLI |
 |
| 3D06 over all score HD 2900XT Crossfire. Well looks to me like ATI HD 2900XT in Crossfire running on system hogging Vista Ultimate with beta drivers is faster. |
 |
| Nvidia 8800 GTX's SLI |
 |
| ATI HD 2900XT's CF, 8800 GTX's SLI out in front. |
 |
| Nvidia 8800 GTX SLI |
 |
| ATI HD 2900XT's CF, again the 8800 GTX SLI is out in front. |
 |
| 8800 GTX's SLI |
 |
| ATI HD 2900XT's CF. Ouch now that's gotta hurt ATI more then doubles the 88's score. |
 |
| 8800 GTX' SLI |
 |
| ATI HD 2900XT CF. ATI again out in front of the 8800 GTX's in SLI. |
 |
| Remember I didn't do these and I don't like ATI at all! But numbers don't lie. Nvidia 8800 GTX's running on windows xp sp1 (no drivers for vista) ATI HD 2900XT's running on Vista Ultimate 64 on beta drivers. Bottom line the 2900's have the best over all score. On Vista & beta drivers! 2 HD2900XT's $900.00, ($840.00 for none HD's) 2 8800 GTX's $1300.00 (Ultra's $1700.00) Let me think $500.00 more to go slower? |